In one line: How much money an industry can make depends on its structure: how fiercely rivals compete, and how much power entrants, buyers, suppliers and substitutes have to take value away.

Core idea

Michael Porter’s framework, first published in 1979 and restated in 2008 [1], asks why some industries are consistently more profitable than others. His answer is that average profitability doesn’t come from how fast an industry grows or how advanced its technology is. It comes from five pressures that decide who captures the value the industry creates. Strategy then means choosing a position where those pressures are weak, or acting to weaken them.

How it works

ForceIt is strong when…An engineering-business example
Rivalry among existing competitorsmany similar competitors, slow growth, high fixed costs, hard to exitseveral contract manufacturers bidding on the same commodity boards
Threat of new entrantslow capital needs, no proprietary technology, easy access to customersa new design house undercutting on price with off-the-shelf parts
Bargaining power of buyersfew large customers, standard products, low cost to switcha single government agency buying a standardized system
Bargaining power of suppliersfew sources, unique inputs, high switching costa sole-source semiconductor foundry or specialty material
Threat of substitutesanother way to meet the same need at a better price-performancesoftware features replacing dedicated hardware

Three cautions in applying it:

  • Define the industry carefully. Draw it too broadly and the forces blur together. Draw it too narrowly and real substitutes get missed.
  • Factors are not forces. Growth, technology, regulation and complementary products matter only through how they change the five forces.
  • Look for the levers, not just a scorecard. The analysis is useful when it shows where to position, which shifts to exploit, or how to reshape the structure, for example by locking in suppliers or raising switching costs.

In practice

Engineers meet the five forces from inside their products. A design choice that uses a single-source part increases supplier power. Building on an open standard lowers barriers to entry for competitors, and for you. A proprietary interface raises buyers’ switching costs. Running the five-forces analysis on your own product line makes it clearer why management pushes some technical decisions and resists others.

Questions to ask yourself

  • Which of the five forces most limits the profitability of my product line?
  • Which of our technical decisions quietly strengthen a supplier’s or a buyer’s hand?
  • What substitute, outside our industry as we define it, could meet our customers’ need more cheaply?

Connections

Sources

[1]
M. E. Porter, “The Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 78–93, Jan. 2008, [Online]. Available: https://hbr.org/2008/01/the-five-competitive-forces-that-shape-strategy