In one line: Everyone has a default way of handling conflict. Knowing yours, and deliberately choosing the style that fits the situation, is the first step to handling conflict well.

Core idea

The Thomas–Kilmann model describes conflict behavior along two dimensions: assertiveness (how hard you pursue your own concerns) and cooperativeness (how hard you pursue the other party’s). Their combinations give five modes:

quadrantChart
  title Conflict modes
  x-axis Uncooperative --> Cooperative
  y-axis Unassertive --> Assertive
  quadrant-1 Collaborating
  quadrant-2 Competing
  quadrant-3 Avoiding
  quadrant-4 Accommodating
  Compromising: [0.5, 0.5]

How it works

ModeCharacterUse it when…Overuse costs
Competingassertive, uncooperativea quick, firm decision is vital (safety, ethics)resentment, silence
Collaboratingassertive, cooperativeboth sides’ concerns are too important to trade offtime, energy
Compromisingmiddle on botha fair, expedient split is good enoughmediocre outcomes
Avoidingunassertive, uncooperativethe issue is trivial or emotions need to coolfestering problems
Accommodatingunassertive, cooperativeyou’re wrong, or the relationship matters morebeing taken for granted
  • No mode is “best.” Skill means fitting the mode to the stakes and the relationship.
  • Assessments reveal defaults, not destiny. Many people find the result accurate for low-stakes conflict but notice that they shift under stress.

In practice

Technical teams commonly default to avoiding (keeping the peace) or competing (winning the technical argument). Both can sink a program: avoided disagreements resurface at integration, and won arguments create quiet opponents. Before a hard discussion, it helps to decide on purpose which mode the situation calls for, rather than letting your habit decide.

Questions to ask yourself

  • What is my default mode, and in what situations does it fail me?
  • Which mode do I almost never use, and when would it have helped?
  • In my current disagreement, what matters more, the issue or the relationship?

Connections

Sources

[1]
K. W. Thomas and R. H. Kilmann, “Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument,” Xicom, Tuxedo, NY, USA, 1974. [Online]. Available: https://kilmanndiagnostics.com/