In one line: Before choosing a design, deliberately widen the space of possibilities: break the problem into pieces, search broadly for ways to solve each, and combine them systematically.

Core idea

A product concept is an approximate description of the technology, working principles and form of the product: how it will satisfy the customer’s needs. Teams that pick the first workable idea rarely find the best one. Ulrich and Eppinger describe a five-step method that spends deliberate effort on generating alternatives before narrowing them [1]. It starts from the mission statement, the customer needs and the target specifications.

How it works

  1. Clarify the problem and decompose it. Break it down by function (energy, material and signal flows), by the sequence of user actions (for a coffee cup: pouring, drinking, washing and storing), or by key customer needs. Focus on the critical sub-problems first.
  2. Search externally:
    • interview lead users and consult experts
    • search patents and published literature
    • benchmark related products, including ones from other industries
  3. Search internally, individually and in groups. Suspend judgment, generate many ideas, welcome ideas that seem infeasible, and use sketches and quick models.
  4. Explore systematically. Use a concept classification tree to prune and organize options, and a concept combination table to combine solutions to each sub-problem into complete concepts.
  5. Reflect on the solutions and the process: did we consider the full space?

In practice

Two classroom examples show the range. In one, a coffee cup’s needs (holds hot liquid, buffers heat, keeps the drink warm, prevents spills, looks good, washes easily) become sub-problems with many independent solutions. In the other, a team starts from an invented self-cleaning surface coating and asks what else could this do? That is concept generation run in reverse, from technology to applications. Breakthroughs often come from borrowing a solution from another field, which is why external search matters as much as brainstorming.

Questions to ask yourself

  • How many genuinely different concepts did we consider before converging?
  • Which sub-problem is critical, and have we searched outside our industry for it?
  • Did anyone search the patent literature before we designed?

Connections

Sources

[1]
K. T. Ulrich and S. D. Eppinger, Product Design and Development, 6th ed. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill Education, 2016.